Reading Mariategui’s chapter “The Problem of the Indian,” I was most drawn to reflect on feudalism and the form it took, the hacienda, under Spanish colonization. Mariategui states on page 23 of the latinfundista (the feudal lord) that “the written law is powerless against his authority, which is supported by custom and habit.” Mariategui is essentially describing how legal and administrative reforms cannot fix the ‘Indian problem’, because it “is rooted in the land tenure system of our economy” (22). As I lack extensive knowledge on the historical progression of the hacienda system in Peru, Mariategui’s chapter draws me instead to consider what I know of feudalism in other areas of the world (don’t worry Jon, I am coming back to Peru, just trust the process).
Largely, feudalism is most associated with Medieval Europe, although it existed in various forms across Asia as well. Feudalism as a system involves the structuring of society around relationships to the land, where the owner is at the top and the workers, or serfs, are at the bottom, tied to the land through a tennant style relationship to the Lord (or whatever they were called) in exchange for their labour and service. Feudalism eventually became less common across Europe post-Middle Ages, as new economic, political and social systems were formed. The reason I went on this tangent was really just to reiterate that feudalism sucks.
Thinking about feualism as the precursor to capitalism and then eventually communism, and considering Mariategui was writing in the early 20th century, I wonder what Peru’s current economic system more closely resembles? Perhaps it really is a combination, with the Indigenous socialism remaining in smaller forms in highland communities. Thinking about Incan communism, I am drawn to think about the concept of The Commons, and what that looked like for Indigenous communities in the Andes pre-Conquest, during colonization, soon after Independence, and now. The Commons refers to something (often both tangible and intangible) that is shared, or common, among a whole community or even society. The Commons can refer to land, resources, knowledge, etc. It is an interactive space, ever growing and changing, and a vital centre for community building and sharing. I wonder how/what form The Commons takes in Andean communities now?
In Chinchero, the weaving shop we went to appeared to be a Common space for the women working/living there. They all seemed to be taking part in both the business and residential side of the building; there were young children running around, and it wasn’t clear who their mother(s) were, because all of the women seemed to be taking on the caretaker position. I am wondering about child-rearing as part of The Commons, as the colloquial phrase “it takes a village” comes from a very real practice that has become less ~common~ due to the mainstream nature of the nuclear family dynamic, particularly in the West and Western-colonized areas.
Anyways, that’s my tangent. Jon has said to me that he is okay with rants, and this certainly counts as one.
Caroline
Hi Caroline, what an insightful post! :) I learned so much from reading this, thanks so much! Your words on feudalism (blech!) and the idea of Indigenous socialism stand out to me...I also like the notion of feudalism "as the precursor to capitalism"- this is not something I'd thought too much about before and gives me a lot to reflect on...
Hm Hm. I hear you, Caroline. Thank you for this discussion on feudalism that then includes more nuanced and personal questioning about commons (child rearing, interactive spaces, community building). I like your definition: "The Commons can refer to land, resources, knowledge." Particularly thinking about knowledge, I grab this sense that knowledge is not merely our definitions and objective understandings but is shared in very subtle, behavioural ways. Knowledge establishes societal norms, which define the old school objectives of feudalism (i.e. cast conceptions among 'lord' and 'surf'). Alternative knowledge, to that time, would pertain to community care and non-extractive working conditions... ?
I feel (from my very much still outsider perceptive) that this alternative knowledges flourishes in a beautiful way here in Pisac particularly, where the village feed sweetness to the bitterness often felt in most capitalist driven business centres. The agency of how people are living today seems so very antithetical to the feudal state. Community/The Commons replacing the coercive authority of 'lord.' I say this to connect to the emphasis on 'customs and habits' described in your chosen quote to be more forceful than law; we, through our behaviour, our life choice, our validation of knowledges write those customs?